Arnold Schwarzenegger Won’t Attend Arnold Sports Festival UK

Arnold Schwarzenegger Won’t Attend Arnold Sports Festival UK
Arnold Schwarzenegger Won’t Attend Arnold Sports Festival UK

[ad_1]

The 2022 Arnold Sports Festival UK (ASFUK) will take place on Sept. 23-25, 2022, in Birmingham, England. The Festival’s namesake, strength sports and Hollywood icon Arnold Schwarzenegger, will not be in attendance. The 2022 Arnold Classic UK and the 2022 Arnold Strongman Classic UK contests are a part of the overall Festival. 

In a formal statement released on Sept. 22, 2022, Executive Director of the Arnold Sports Festival, Brian Flowers, noted that Schwarzenegger wouldn’t be in attendance at this year’s edition because of financial issues behind the scenes

“While Gov. Schwarzenegger very much wished to attend, we were informed that financial obligations to a variety of people had not been met and requested assurances that the financial commitments to all competitors be satisfied by having monies put it in escrow for them,” Flowers wrote. “As a result of the Promoter’s failure to do so and the fact we were never able to reach an agreement with the Promoter regarding details of the appearance, Gov. Schwarzenegger will not appear in-person.”

The ASFUK Instagram page released its own statement. It clarified that fans who have special event tickets to the Festival would be contacted at an undisclosed time:

[Related: The Best Landmine Workouts for More Muscle and Better Conditioning]

With the hiccup between Schwarzenegger’s non-attendance and promoters, the other significant change to the ASFUK is that the Festival will have a new name, “Experience With Sports Festival UK,” moving forward. Whether this change would take place immediately for the 2022 edition or go into effect in 2023 was not disclosed. 

“We are looking forward to growing the Experience With Sports Festival UK, and we are eager to bring you on this journey with us,” the ASFUK Instagram page wrote. 

2022 will mark the second straight occasion that Schwarzenegger does not attend the Festival. He missed the inaugural edition after concerns with COVID-19. 

[Related: The Best HIIT Workouts with Bodyweight, with Kettlebells, and More]

The 2022 ASFUK features various tentpole contests involving sports like powerlifting, CrossFit, and bodybuilding. The status of the latter segment — the 2022 Arnold Classic UK — was addressed by the International Federation of Bodybuilding and Fitness (IFBB) Pro League in a statement released on Sept. 22, 2022.

The organization, led by President Jim Manion, guaranteed that “all IFBB Pro League athletes who place at the 2022 ASF will be paid.” The 2022 Arnold Classic UK features nine divisions from the Men’s Open and 212 to Women’s Physique and Bikini. 

At the time of this writing, the 2022 ASFUK is proceeding as planned. In the event of any new developments or updates, Breaking Muscle will adjust this information accordingly. 

Featured image: @arnoldsportsuk on Instagram

[ad_2]

Source link

Have a Delicious Weekend. | Cup of Jo

Have a Delicious Weekend. | Cup of Jo
Have a Delicious Weekend. | Cup of Jo

[ad_1]

Vermont cider donut

Vermont cider donut

What are you up to this weekend? We are driving up to Vermont to see the fall leaves. They might still be pretty green, but either way, we’re excited for cider donuts and these alpine slides. Shana Tovah to our readers who are celebrating the Jewish holidays! Hope you have a good one, and here are a few links from around the web…

Our girl Stella Blackmon was featured in the NYTimes! Her short films about teenage life are amazing. (NYTimes gift link)

These thank you cards made me laugh.

Should I bring anything to the dinner tonight or just my crippling anxiety?”

Very, very chocolate-y brownies.

Is there anything cozier than an oversized turtleneck you can play hide-and-seek in? Striped, mustard, green.

This Goodnight Moon essay brought me to my knees. “Our son arrived in the world like a comet breaking the sound barrier, or Kramer skidding into Jerry’s apartment… He was bewitching, sweet, playful and wildly entertaining, the kind of baby strangers admired in the grocery store. But his evening routine almost broke me,” writes Elizabeth Egan, who tried everything to help her son sleep. Nothing worked, until one night, when she read Goodnight Moon. “A warm, doughy starfish hand came to rest on my wrist and remained there as I turned the pages. A fragrant, damp head plunked onto my shoulder. At the end of the book, my son took a finger out of his mouth and said quietly, ‘Again.’” (NYTimes gift link)

Small bedroom ideas. (Drooling over #2.)

Loving this flirty text exchange.

The sexual assault activist who finds joy in fashion. At NYFW, “a commonly asked question is, ‘What are you wearing?,’ and as I was talking about what I chose to wear that day, I had this remarkable moment where I was like, I’ve been asked this exact question, but it was the complete opposite experience. It was after my rape. That time, that sentence was shaming me and presuming guilt for the violence that happened to me. It was very full circle. I then created the Survivor Fashion Show so that survivors can take back this question.” (NYMag)

Funny clouds, of all things.

Plus, three reader comments:

Says Jen on what’s made you laugh lately: “This made me laugh today!”

Says Lauren O. on a trick to staying present: “I deleted Pokémon GO from my phone a couple of years ago because I realized I hadn’t called my mom on one of my daily walks in months, and the first time I went, without I saw A LIVE EEL SLITHERING ACROSS THE SIDEWALK! (I was walking through Chinatown and it had sloshed out of a tank at one of the fish markets.) I sprang into action to rescue it and friends, ‘slippery as an eel’ is no joke.”

Says Maeve on let’s find this reader a back-to-law-school outfit: “Anne, as the daughter of a mom who went to law school while my sister and I were little (I was starting kindergarten), I want you to know what an incredible example you are setting for your little ones. I am immensely proud of my mom for a million reasons but one of them is the bravery she displayed in that decision (and each of her decisions to keep learning — she is 62 and just took up rollerblading and German classes!). She had always wanted to be a criminal prosecutor, but her father told her to ‘accept her lot in life and find contentedness in it’ (he is a product of his context, as we all are). My memories of her time in school largely consist of special moments with my dad. He was a lawyer already, but he took a step back from his career in many ways so that my mom could take a step forward in hers. And when my mom did the opening of her first murder trial before a jury several years later, my dad took my sister and me to see it. We had front row seats to the proof that it is never too late to start a new chapter. And, perhaps unsurprisingly, I became a prosecutor, too. I just wanted to be my mom. Still do. Whatever you wear, Anne, you are so brave and alongside your kids and husband, this whole community is rooting for you.”

(Photo by Laura Austin/Stocksy.)

[ad_2]

Source link

New and Noteworthy: What I Read This Week—Edition 195

New and Noteworthy: What I Read This Week—Edition 195
New and Noteworthy: What I Read This Week—Edition 195

[ad_1]

Research of the Week

Babies in the womb “smile” when the mother eats carrots and “frown” when the mother eats kale.

ApoB might not be the predictive biomarker we thought.

Burpee training improves endurance and short term memory in teens.

Kidney recipients actually need more protein than you think.

Wolves can attach to humans.

New Primal Kitchen Podcasts

Primal Kitchen Podcast: The Link Between Dairy Intolerance and Dairy Genes with Alexandre Family Farm Founders Blake and Stephanie

Primal Health Coach Radio: Declare Your Expertise, Then Embody It with Marcy Morrison

Media, Schmedia

Why this RD isn’t worth listening to.”

How many ants on Earth?

Interesting Blog Posts

Why our ancestors’ skin held up to the sun.

The benefits of wood in school.

Social Notes

Americans mostly eat a plant-based diet.

Get outside.

Everything Else

On Stable Diffusion, the newest “AI tool.”

On saturated fat.

Things I’m Up to and Interested In

Interesting, oddly specific research: Living near a fast-casual Mexican restaurant reduced maternal weight gain among US-born mothers living in Miami.

Overwhelming endorsement: Replacing bacon with larvae “not as terrible as they thought.”

Great research: Autophagy-inducing supplements spontaneously increase walking speed.

Important: How caffeine improves endurance.

Interesting paper: More DHA and tuna intake, longer telomeres (in males).

Question I’m Asking

How do you celebrate Fall?

Recipe Corner

Time Capsule

One year ago (Sep 18 – Sep 24)

Comment of the Week

“‘How do you handle a night of bad sleep?’

on the following day: stay active with low-risk activities (hiking, walking…) outdoors.
Power-nap (20 min max) around noon, go to bed early, no alcohol, no carb-excesses (seems to massively impair REM sleep for me).

best regards
Martin”

-Spot on, Martin.

(function($) {
$(“#dfLDDPG”).load(“https://www.marksdailyapple.com/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php?action=dfads_ajax_load_ads&groups=674&limit=1&orderby=random&order=ASC&container_id=&container_html=none&container_class=&ad_html=div&ad_class=&callback_function=&return_javascript=0&_block_id=dfLDDPG” );
})( jQuery );

Primal Kitchen Ranch

The post New and Noteworthy: What I Read This Week—Edition 195 appeared first on Mark's Daily Apple.

[ad_2]

Source link

Are Transgender People at Risk of Breast Cancer?

Are Transgender People at Risk of Breast Cancer?
Are Transgender People at Risk of Breast Cancer?

[ad_1]

People of all genders can get breast cancer, so it’s important for trans men and trans women to consider that as part of their health care.

“Anyone who has breast tissue could potentially or theoretically develop breast cancer,” says Fan Liang, MD, medical director of the Center for Transgender Health at Johns Hopkins Medicine in Baltimore.

Many things influence your breast cancer risk, including your own medical history, any family history of breast cancer, whether you have certain genes that make breast cancer more likely, and whether you get gender-affirming treatment.

There aren’t yet official breast cancer screening guidelines that are specific to trans people. But experts do have general recommendations, detailed below.

You should talk with your doctor about what screening you need, when to start, and how often. Of course, if you notice a lump or other unusual breast change, see your doctor to get it checked out. (“Screening” refers to routine checking for possible signs of breast cancer, not diagnosing what a lump or other change may be.)

Breast Cancer Screening Recommendations for Trans Women

Each person is unique. In gauging trans women’s breast cancer risk, one of the factors that doctors consider include whether they are taking hormone therapy, their age, and for how long. That’s on top of all the other breast cancer risk factors a person might have.

Trans women who take estrogen as part of hormone therapy: If you’re older than 50, get a mammogram every 2 years after you’ve been taking hormones for at least 5 to 10 years.

Not all trans women take gender-affirming hormone therapy. Those who do will develop breast tissue. Any breast tissue can develop breast cancer. And estrogen, which is part of this therapy, does raise the risk for breast cancer.

If you start taking estrogen as an adult, it may not raise your risk as much as if you start taking it as a teen because over your lifetime, you’d have less exposure to estrogen. There hasn’t been a lot of research in this area yet, so it’s not clear how much taking estrogen raises risk for people of various ages.

Trans women with the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes and/or a strong family history of breast cancer: These genes raise your risk of breast cancer. So it’s very important that you discuss with your doctor how to manage this risk, such as with screenings or other preventive care. You may need to start getting mammograms earlier – and get them more often.

“There are other health conditions, not just cancer, that might not make you a good candidate for estrogen,” says Gwendolyn Quinn, PhD, professor of obstetrics and gynecology at NYU Grossman School of Medicine in New York. “That’s why the decision to use hormones should be overseen by a health care provider, but many trans people don’t have access to a clinician and buy their hormones on the internet.”

If you aren’t taking gender-affirming therapy but are considering it, make sure your doctor knows that you are BRCA-positive.

“It’s not a formal recommendation, but there has been talk about testing trans women for BRCA before starting gender-affirming hormones,” Quinn says. “But a lot of people feel that gender-affirming hormones are lifesaving and that it’s unreasonable to ask that trans women get tested first.”

If you do have a doctor and want to get tested for the BRCA genes – and other genes linked to breast cancer – your doctor can help you find out about what’s involved.

Trans women who don’t take hormones: Although there’s no recommended screening timing, be sure to see your doctor if you notice any breast lumps or changes – and tell them about anyone in your family who’s had breast cancer.

Trans women who got breast augmentation: Some trans women choose to get breast augmentation surgery to create the look of breasts. This is done with implants, fat transferred from another place on the body, or a combination of those methods.

Fat transfer uses your own body fat from somewhere else on your body to create breasts, and studies don’t show that this raises breast cancer risk. Today’s breast implants don’t cause breast cancer, either. They have been linked to a low risk of a rare form of cancer called anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (ALCL). There hasn’t been a lot of research on implant-related ALCL specifically in trans women. But in one review, researchers called it a “rare but serious” complication and recommended being aware of the risk and keeping up with any follow-up care after getting the implants.

Breast Cancer Screening Recommendations for Trans Men

Among the many factors that can affect your risk are whether you’ve had “top surgery” to change the appearance of your chest, whether you take testosterone, and whether you have certain genes that make breast cancer more likely.

Trans men who have not had top surgery or who have only had breast reduction: Get a mammogram every year or two starting at age 40.

If you haven’t had top surgery, your breast cancer risk is the same as it was before you transitioned. That’s true whether or not you’ve had a hysterectomy (surgery to remove your uterus). Removal of the ovaries and uterus only somewhat lowers breast cancer risk. Removing the breasts makes the biggest impact on breast cancer risk.

Trans men who have had top surgery: You may not have enough breast tissue to put in a mammogram machine, so your doctor may recommend that you do self-exams and also get breast exams done by a doctor.

Not every trans man gets top surgery. But some do. Top surgery lowers breast cancer risk, but not as much as a mastectomy you’d get to prevent or treat breast cancer.

With a breast cancer mastectomy, the goal is to remove as much breast tissue as possible, including tissue under the arms and on the ribcage. With top surgery, the aim is different: to change the chest’s appearance to be flatter. “The breast mass is removed, but we don’t go after every single cell because it’s not necessary to do that in order to get the overall result that we want,” Liang says.

“How much surgery lowers [breast cancer] risk depends on how much tissue is left behind, including the nipple, where there’s also potential for cancer cells to develop,” Quinn says.

Trans men who have the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene mutations and have had standard top surgery (but not a complete preventive mastectomy): You may need annual breast cancer screenings. Since you likely won’t have enough breast tissue to put into a mammogram machine, a breast cancer specialist may need to give you a chest exam. It’s important that your doctors know that you are BRCA+ so they can make a preventive screening plan for you based on how much breast tissue you have.

Trans men who take hormone therapy with testosterone: Testosterone suppresses estrogen. So if you take hormone therapy with testosterone consistently over time, your breast cancer risk is likely to be somewhat lower. But if you don’t take testosterone – or if you only take a low dose or take it intermittently – you won’t have that protective benefit.

Regardless of whether or not you take testosterone therapy, there is still at least some risk for breast cancer. Your doctor can advise you about what screening you need.

Finding Gender-Affirming Care

While experts can make recommendations about cancer screenings for trans people, finding a gender-affirming health care provider is easier said than done in some places.

The World Professional Association for Transgender Health has an online directory of providers of gender-affirming care. You may also simply call doctors in your area and ask about their experience with providing care to trans patients.

“If you can’t find a transgender health clinic near where you live, call the doctor beforehand,” Liang says. “Ask about the provider’s experience with transgender preventive care. See how they respond to the question – whether they have an understanding of what you need or whether the question seems to them to come out of left field.” Your health concerns – about breast cancer or anything else – should be taken seriously and treated with respect by your health care team.

[ad_2]

Source link

Modified Purple Tomato May Be Coming to Your Grocery Store

Modified Purple Tomato May Be Coming to Your Grocery Store
Modified Purple Tomato May Be Coming to Your Grocery Store

[ad_1]

Sept. 23, 2022 — No matter how you slice it, a genetically engineered purple tomato just got one step closer to showing up in U.S. grocery stores.

The U.K. company developing the new purple fruit has passed a first test with U.S. regulators, demonstrating that genetic changes to the tomatoes do not expose the plants to a greater risk for pest damage.

The purple tomatoes are the first to pass the new SECURE law in the United States. The SECURE Act became law in phases between May 2020 and October 2021. The new U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) rules update how the agency reviews genetically modified foods, focusing more on the food itself than the process used to create it.

More Than Skin Deep

Not to be confused with tomatoes with purple skin only, the tomatoes are purple inside and out. Genes taken from the purple snapdragon plant provide the color and boost levels of anthocyanins. Norfolk Plant Sciences says the tomatoes contain 10 times more of this antioxidant than ordinary tomatoes, and therefore provide additional health benefits.

Also known as “super tomatoes,” the purple tomatoes can now be imported, cross state lines, and be “released” into the environment. The company plans to provide seed packets to home gardeners once they receive final regulatory approval.

Norfolk used a common agricultural bacterium, aptly named agrobacterium, to deliver the genetic changes to the Micro Tom tomato variety. Next, the company introduced the same changes into other tomato varieties through cross breeding.

Some genetically modified organisms (GMOs) on grocery shelves can be hard to identify. Many are genetically changed to make them easier to ship or to last longer on shelves, but these properties do not change how they look. However, the deep purple tomatoes from Norfolk Plant Sciences will likely stand out in the produce aisle.

Move over, eggplant. You’re not the only purple fruit in town. (And yes, both are fruits.)

A Boost to Food Innovation?

“We are pleased that the USDA reviewed our bioengineered purple tomato and reached the decision that ‘from a plant pest risk perspective, this plant may be safely grown and used in breeding in the United States,’” says Nathan Pumplin, PhD, CEO of Norfolk Plant Science’s U.S.-based commercial arm.

“This decision represents an important step to enable innovative scientists and small companies to develop and test new, safe products with consumers and farmers,” Pumplin says.

The new federal law was designed to encourage innovation while reducing pest risks, says Andrew Walmsley, senior director for government affairs at the American Farm Bureau Federation.

“We have been genetically modifying plants and animals since we ceased being mostly hunters and gatherers,” Walmsley says. “Improved genetics provide a multitude of societal benefits including, but not limited to, more nutritious food.”

Concerns From the Non-GMO Camp

Not everyone is enthusiastic about these new tomatoes.

When asked what consumers should consider, “We want them to be aware that if this is a genetically modified product,” says Hans Eisenbeis, director of mission and messaging at the non-GMO Project, a nonprofit organization in Bellingham, WA, that verifies consumer products that do not contain GMO ingredients.

GMOs are pretty ubiquitous in our food system,” he says. “It’s important that [consumers] know this particular tomato is genetically engineered in case they are choosing to avoid GMOs.”

There are other ways to get high levels of anthocyanins, he says, including from blueberries.

Eisenbeis considers the SECURE law changes a “deregulation” of GMOs in agriculture, weakening the ability of the USDA’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service to regulate these products.

One concern is that the same mechanism used to genetically modify this plant could be used for others and “open up the door potentially for genetic applications that are entirely unregulated,” Eisenbeis says.

Acknowledging there are skeptics of GMO products, Pumplin says, “Skepticism can be a good start to learning when it is followed by gathering solid information. We encourage people to learn about the science-based facts of GMOs and the ways that GMOs can benefit consumers and the climate.”

“In addition, there are many non-GMO and Organic Certified products available on the market, and consumers who choose to avoid GMOs have many good choices,” Pumplin adds. “New products improved with biotechnology will offer extra choices to some consumers who are interested in the benefits.”

How Will They Stack Up?

Passing the first regulatory hurdle from the SECURE rule does not mean the purple tomatoes can start rolling into stores just yet. Regulation from several federal agencies could still apply, including the FDA, the EPA, and other divisions of the USDA. The tomatoes may also need to meet label requirements from the Agriculture Marketing Service.

Norfolk Plant Sciences voluntarily submitted a food and feed safety and nutritional assessment report to the FDA.

Time will tell what further hurdles, if any, the purple tomato will need to overcome before it can form a purple pyramid in your local produce aisle.

“We want to bring our tomatoes to market with care and without rushing them,” Pumplin says.

[ad_2]

Source link

New Coronavirus Found in Bats That Is Resistant to Vaccines

New Coronavirus Found in Bats That Is Resistant to Vaccines
New Coronavirus Found in Bats That Is Resistant to Vaccines

[ad_1]

It’s the news that public health experts expect but dread: virus-hunting researchers have discovered a new coronavirus in bats that could spell trouble for the human population. The virus can infect human cells and is already able to skirt the immune protection from COVID-19 vaccines.

Reporting in the journal PLoS Pathogens, scientists led by Michael Letko, assistant professor in the Paul Allen School of Public Health at Washington State University, found a group of coronaviruses similar to SARS-CoV-2 that were initially discovered living in bats in Russia in 2020. At the time, scientists did not think the virus, called Khosta-2, posed a threat to people.

But when Letko’s team did a more careful analysis, they found that the virus could infect human cells in the lab, the first warning sign that it could become a possible public health threat. A related virus also found in the Russian bats, Khosta-1, could not enter human cells readily, but Khosta-2 could. Khosta-2 attaches to the same protein, ACE2, that SARS-CoV-2 uses to penetrate human cells. “Receptors on human cells are the way that viruses get into cells,” says Letko. “If a virus can’t get in the door, then it can’t get into the cell, and it’s difficult to establish any type of infection.”

Khosta-2 doesn’t appear to have that problem, since it seems to infect human cells readily. Even more troubling, when Letko combined serum from people who have been vaccinated against COVID-19 with Khosta-2, the antibodies in the serum did not neutralize the virus. The same thing happened when they combined the Khosta-2 virus with serum from people who had recovered from Omicron infections.

“We don’t want to scare anybody and say this is a completely vaccine-resistant virus,” Letko says. “But it is concerning that there are viruses circulating in nature that have these properties—they can bind to human receptors and are not so neutralized by current vaccine responses.”

The good news is that Letko’s studies show that, like the Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2, Khosta-2 does not seem to have genes that would suggest it could cause serious disease in people. But that could change if Khosta-2 starts circulating more widely and mixing with genes from SARS-CoV-2. “One of the things we’re worried about is that when related coronaviruses get into the same animal, and into the same cells, then they can recombine and out comes a new virus,” says Letko. “The worry is that SARS-CoV-2 could spill back over to animals infected with something like Khosta-2 and recombine and then infect human cells. They could be resistant to vaccine-immunity and also have some more virulent factors. What the chances of that are, who knows. But it could in theory happen during a recombination event.”

It’s a sobering reminder that pathogens are ready and waiting to jump from any number of animal species into humans. And in many cases, as with SARS-CoV-2, these microbes will be new to people and therefore encounter little resistance in the form of immunity against them. “These viruses are really widespread everywhere, and are going to continue to be an issue for humans in general,” says Letko.

The findings come as the World Health Organization’s (WHO) ACT—Accelerator’s Council Tracking and Accelerating Progress—working group report that continued response to the COVID-19 pandemic, in the form of testing, vaccinations, and treatments, is stalling. With lower global immunity to the current SARS-CoV-2 virus, combating any new pathogens, including new coronaviruses like Khosta-2, would become more difficult. According to the latest data collected by the WHO, a quarter of people around the world still have not received a primary series of COVID-19 vaccination.

Ultimately, having deeper dossiers on the microbial world, especially information on how well certain viruses can infect human cells, for example, will be important to making the response to public health threats more efficient and more powerful. Letko is working on building a database that includes information on which human receptors viruses use to infect cells, and whether or not those viruses can evade existing vaccines. That way, he says, when new microbes are discovered that are similar to those in the database, researchers could have a head start on understanding how to control them. “At some point in the future, as these outbreaks continue, we won’t have to scramble whenever a new virus spills over into people,” he says. “We could plug the virus into the database, and understand that it probably uses these receptors to get into human cells, and might be resistant to these types of vaccines or treatments. It’s a 10- to 20-year goal, but it’s possible. It’s not just a pipe dream.”

More Must-Read Stories From TIME


Contact us at [email protected].

[ad_2]

Source link

Flint Water Crisis Left Long-Term Mental Health Consequences

Flint Water Crisis Left Long-Term Mental Health Consequences
Flint Water Crisis Left Long-Term Mental Health Consequences

[ad_1]

The Jackson, Mississippi, water crisis this summer is a troubling reminder that some American communities are still failing to provide safe water to their residents. After Jackson’s primary water treatment plant failed, around 180,000 people were left with little or no sanitary water. It was reminiscent of the crisis in Flint, Michigan, which rose to broad public awareness in 2015, when residents learned that they’d been poisoned for months by drinking water containing bacteria, disinfectant byproducts, and lead.

The crisis is far from a distant memory in Flint. According to a new survey of nearly 2,000 adult community members published in JAMA Network Open on Sept. 20, residents were still struggling from the enduring mental health impact of the crisis, five years later. After conducting a survey from 2019 to 2020, the researchers estimated that in the year before the survey, about one in five Flint residents presumptively experienced major depression, while a quarter had PTSD, and one in 10 had both illnesses. Those who believed that they or their families were hurt by the contaminated water were significantly more likely to be affected. The authors note that lead itself can impact mental health, including mood.

Flint residents, who are largely low-income and people of color, were already vulnerable to mental-health issues, including because of systemic racism, a shortage of quality affordable housing, and widespread poverty. However, the researchers found evidence that the water crisis itself had a lasting mental health impact. For instance, 41% of respondents said they’d felt mental or emotional problems related to their concerns about water contamination. Flint residents were more than twice as likely to have had major depression compared to the general population rate in Michigan, U.S., or the world, and were twice as likely to have PTSD compared to veterans after deployment, according to the study.

The way the water crisis unfolded made Flint residents particularly vulnerable to long-term mental-health effects, the researchers say. One major problem is that public officials’ decisions caused the water crisis in 2014, when they switched the city to untreated water from the Flint River. Even after health care workers raised alarms about high levels of lead in children’s blood, officials misled the public by insisting that the water was safe. “Feelings that the community is not being looked after, or it’s in fact being abandoned, add an additional layer of stress,” says Aaron Reuben, a co-author of the new study and postdoctoral scholar at Duke University and the Medical University of South Carolina.

A lack of resources can also compound anxiety. Lottie Ferguson, the chief resilience officer for the City of Flint, noted that food insecurity made it harder for residents to eat a healthy diet rich with foods that mitigate the effects of lead toxicity. Ferguson, who worked in Flint during the crisis and whose children were exposed to lead, says that she felt for parents who didn’t have the same resources as her family. “I was more upset and more hurt for parents who didn’t have access to resources to ensure the futures of their children,” she says, adding that she understands why mistrust of officials is still common in Flint.

Also complicating the situation: the water crisis dragged on for a long period of time. Although the water supply was switched back to its original source in October 2015, lead levels didn’t drop below the federal limit until January 2017. That’s left Flint residents with a lasting sense of uncertainty about their health and safety. “It wasn’t like a hurricane that came and went, and then you rebuild,” says Lauren Tompkins, the former vice president of clinical operations at Genesee Health System, a nonprofit health care organization in Flint. She coordinated the emergency mental health resources available to residents in response to the crisis. “The pipes took quite some number of years to fix. So you’re just constantly in this state, for a long period of time, of worrying.”

In many ways, the water crisis has yet to end. For instance, researchers have described a rise in hyperactivity and learning delays among children. Residents still don’t know for sure how deeply they and their families were affected by the polluted water, and whether it triggered health problems they’re experiencing now. They also don’t know if new health issues will suddenly appear in the future.

That’s similar to what happened after the partial meltdown at Three Mile Island nuclear plant in Pennsylvania in 1979, says study co-author Dean G. Kilpatrick, a professor of psychiatry at the Medical University of South Carolina, who researches PTSD and traumatic events. Although locals weren’t exposed to dangerous levels of radiation, the fear that they would be led to lasting mental health harm. “If something’s invisible, tasteless, you can’t really tell if you’ve got it or not,” says Kilpatrick. “Even the perception that you might have been exposed to something, in and of itself, is sufficient to drive a lot of long-term mental-health effects.”

With the help of outside funding and assistance, Flint community members expanded mental-health offerings in Flint, both during the initial crisis and the years that followed. However, only 34.8% of respondents said they were offered mental-health services for symptoms related to the crisis, although 79.3% of those who were offered services took advantage of them. The study’s authors argue that their findings indicate Flint still needs a greater mental health response from the local, state, and federal government. There are also important lessons for other cities enduring water crises, including Jackson—such as how important it is to provide the public with clear, accurate information.

Overall, says Reuben, it’s essential to recognize that crises like what happened in Flint can have an enduring impact on mental health. In Jackson, “We want the community to know we’re thinking about them, and we’re going to think about their mental health,” he says. “Not just once the taps run clear, but potentially for years after.”

More Must-Read Stories From TIME


Contact us at [email protected].

[ad_2]

Source link

Flu season could be rough this year : Shots

Flu season could be rough this year : Shots
Flu season could be rough this year : Shots

[ad_1]

Health officials are predicting this winter could see an active flu season on top of potential COVID surges. In short, it’s a good year to be a respiratory virus. Left: Image of SARS-CoV-2 omicron virus particles (pink) replicating within an infected cell (teal). Right: Image of an inactive H3N2 influenza virus.



NIAID/Science Source


hide caption

toggle caption



NIAID/Science Source

Health officials are predicting this winter could see an active flu season on top of potential COVID surges. In short, it’s a good year to be a respiratory virus. Left: Image of SARS-CoV-2 omicron virus particles (pink) replicating within an infected cell (teal). Right: Image of an inactive H3N2 influenza virus.



NIAID/Science Source

The flu virtually disappeared for two years as the pandemic raged. But influenza appears poised to stage a come-back this year in the U.S., threatening to cause a long-feared “twindemic.”

While the flu and the coronavirus are both notoriously unpredictable, there’s a good chance COVID cases will surge again this winter, and troubling signs that the flu could return too.

“This could very well be the year in which we see a twindemic,” says Dr. William Schaffner, an infectious disease professor at Vanderbilt University. “That is, we have a surge in COVID and simultaneously an increase in influenza. We could have them both affecting our population at the same time.”

The strongest indication that the flu could hit the U.S. this winter is what happened during the Southern Hemisphere’s winter. Flu returned to some countries, such as Australia, where the respiratory infection started ramping up months earlier than normal, and caused one of the worst flu seasons in recent years.

What happens in the Southern Hemisphere’s winter often foreshadows what’s going to happen north of the equator.

“If we have a serious influenza season, and if the omicron variants continue to cause principally mild disease, this coming winter could be a much worse flu season than COVID,” Schaffner warns.

And the combination of the two viruses could seriously strain the health system, he says. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that flu causes between 140,00 and 710,000 hospitalizations annually.

“We should be worried,” says Dr. Richard Webby, an infectious disease specialist at St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital. “I don’t necessarily think it’s run-for-the-hills worried. But we need to be worried.”

The main reason the flu basically disappeared the last two years was the behavior changes people made to avoid COVID, such as staying home, avoiding public gatherings, wearing masks, and not traveling. That prevented flu viruses from spreading too. But those measures have mostly been abandoned.

“As the community mitigation measures start to roll off around the world and people return to their normal activities, flu has started to circulate around the world,” says Dr. Alicia Fry, who leads influenza epidemiology and prevention for the CDC. “We can expect a flu season this year — for sure.”

Young kids at especially high risk

The CDC is reporting that the flu is already starting to spread in parts of the south, such as Texas. And experts caution very young kids may be especially at risk this year.

Though COVID-19 generally has been mild for young people, the flu typically poses the biggest threat to both the elderly and children. The main strain of flu that’s currently circulating, H3N2, tends to hit the elderly hard. But health experts are also worried about young children who have not been exposed to flu for two years.

“You have the 1-year-olds, the 2-year-olds, and the 3-year-olds who will all be seeing it for the first time, and none of them have any preexisting immunity to influenza,” says Dr. Helen Chu, assistant professor of medicine and allergy and infectious diseases and an adjunct assistant professor of epidemiology at the University of Washington.

In fact, the flu does appear to have hit younger people especially hard in Australia.

“We know that schools are really the places where influenza spreads. They’re really considered the drivers of transmission,” Chu says. “They’ll be the spreaders. They will then take it home to the parents. The parents will then take it to the workplace. They’ll take it to the grandparents who are in assisted living, nursing home. And then those populations will then get quite sick with the flu.”

“I think we’re heading into a bad flu season,” Chu says.

‘Viral interference’ could offset the risks

Some experts doubt COVID and flu will hit the country simultaneously because of a phenomenon known as “viral interference,” which occurs when infection with one virus reduces the risk of catching another. That’s an additional possible reason why flu disappeared the last two years.

“These two viruses may still both occur during the same season, but my gut feeling is they’re going to happen sequentially rather than both at the same time,” Webby says. “So I’m less concerned about the twindemic.”

Nevertheless, Webby and others are urging people to make sure everyone in the family gets a flu shot as soon as possible, especially if the flu season arrives early in the U.S. too. (Most years officials don’t start pushing people to get their flu shots until October.)

So far it looks like this year’s flu vaccines are a good match with the circulating strains and so should provide effective protection.

But health officials fear fewer people will get flu shots this year than usual because of anti-vaccine sentiment that increased in reaction to COVID vaccinations. Flu vaccine rates are already lagging.

“We are worried that people will not get vaccinated. And influenza vaccine is the best prevention tool that we have,” the CDC’s Fry says.

Fry also hopes that some of the habits people developed to fight COVID will continue and help blunt the impact of the flu.

“The wild card here is we don’t know how many mitigation practices people will use,” Fry says. “For example, people now stay home when they’re sick instead of going to work. They keep their kids out of school. Schools are strict about not letting kids come to school if their sick. All of these types of things could reduce transmission.”

[ad_2]

Source link